top of page

Breakthrough Systemic Embolism on Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: Warfarin vs. DOAC (Apixaban), Management, and Precautions

By: Dr. Abdelwahab Arrazaghi, MD, FABIM, FRCPC

ree

Abstract

Two patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) experienced systemic embolism despite guideline-concordant oral anticoagulation (OAC): (1) splenic infarction on therapeutic warfarin (INR >2) and (2) renal infarction on apixaban 5 mg twice daily. These rare but recognized “breakthrough” events occur with both vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This review compares failure rates of warfarin vs. DOACs, explores underlying mechanisms, outlines a practical evaluation, and provides evidence-based management strategies—including when to consider left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).


Case Vignettes

Case A (Warfarin): AF on warfarin with therapeutic INR >2 presented with acute left upper-quadrant pain; CT confirmed splenic infarction.

Case B (Apixaban): AF on apixaban 5 mg twice daily with appropriate dosing criteria presented with flank pain; CT confirmed renal infarction.

These cases highlight the residual risk of systemic embolism despite appropriate anticoagulation.


How Often Does Anticoagulation Fail?

  • Apixaban vs. warfarin (ARISTOTLE trial): stroke/systemic embolism (SE) occurred at 1.27%/year with apixaban vs. 1.60%/year with warfarin—with apixaban showing both efficacy and safety benefits.

  • Residual risk perspective: contemporary data suggest ~1–2%/year breakthrough ischemic events in anticoagulated AF patients, depending on baseline risk.

  • Warfarin: Outcomes strongly depend on time in therapeutic range (TTR). TTR <65% markedly increases stroke/SE, bleeding, and mortality; optimal control requires TTR ≥70–75%. A single therapeutic INR may mask poor historical control.

  • DOACs: Failures often relate to missed doses, drug interactions, underdosing, renal dysfunction, or extremes of body size.


Why Do Thromboembolic Events Occur on OAC?

Contributors include:

  • Suboptimal exposure

    • Warfarin: low TTR, vitamin K variability, drug interactions.

    • DOACs: missed doses; CYP3A4/P-gp inducers (e.g., rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, St. John’s wort); renal impairment; extreme body weight; malabsorption.

  • Thrombus despite OAC

    • Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus occurs in ~2–4% of AF patients even on therapeutic OAC; higher risk with persistent AF, left atrial dilation, low LAA velocity, and heart failure.

  • Alternative embolic sources / prothrombotic states

    • Aortic/arterial plaque, endocarditis, malignancy, myeloproliferative disorders, paradoxical embolism, or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

    • DOACs are not recommended in high-risk APS; warfarin is preferred.


Practical Evaluation After Breakthrough Embolism

Step 1 — Confirm exposure & interactions

  • Verify adherence (pharmacy records, pill counts).

  • Review drug–drug/supplement interactions.

  • Reassess renal function, body weight, and correct DOAC dosing.

  • For warfarin: calculate TTR over prior 6–12 months.

Step 2 — Consider drug-level testing (selective use)

  • DOAC-specific anti–factor Xa assays may clarify exposure in special cases (malabsorption, extreme weight, renal failure).

Step 3 — Search for embolic substrate

  • Echocardiography (TEE/cardiac CT) for LAA thrombus, LA size, LV function, valves.

  • Vascular imaging (aorta, renal/splenic arteries).

  • Targeted hypercoagulable work-up if suspicion (APS, JAK2 mutation, occult malignancy).

Step 4 — Reassess stroke & bleeding risk

  • Update CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores.

  • Optimize modifiable risk factors (BP, sleep apnea, weight, alcohol, diabetes).


Condition-Specific Management

A) Splenic Infarction (on warfarin)

  • Supportive care: hydration, analgesia, infection management.

  • Continue anticoagulation unless bleeding/rupture.

  • Monitor for complications (abscess, rupture).

  • Vaccinate if functional asplenia suspected.

B) Renal Infarction (on apixaban)

  • Confirm with CT/CTA.

  • Continue anticoagulation; parenteral therapy optional if diagnostic uncertainty.

  • Endovascular therapy only in proximal occlusion, early presentation, or solitary kidney.

  • Monitor kidney function: AKI occurs in 20–40%, chronic impairment in ~⅓.


What to Change in Anticoagulation After a Breakthrough Event?

  • On warfarin:

    • If TTR <70%, switch to a DOAC or intensify warfarin management.

    • If TTR ≥70–75% but event occurs, consider switching to a DOAC (apixaban preferred).

  • On apixaban/DOAC:

    • Correct reversible contributors (adherence, interactions, renal dosing).

    • If exposure verified, consider switching class (e.g., to dabigatran) or to warfarin (INR 2–3).

    • Adding antiplatelet therapy is not recommended without another clear indication.

  • If LAA thrombus persists despite OAC:

    • Continue therapy and re-image.

    • If unresolved, multidisciplinary discussion for LAAO.


Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO)

  • 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS AF Guideline:

    • Reasonable (Class 2a) if CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2 and contraindication to OAC.

    • May be reasonable (Class 2b) for recurrent embolism despite adequate OAC.


Key Precautions & Prevention Checklist

  • Confirm correct DOAC dosing (apixaban 5 mg bid unless ≥2 of: age ≥80, weight ≤60 kg, creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL).

  • Eliminate drug interactions.

  • Ensure adherence (pillbox, reminders, pharmacy packs).

  • Monitor renal function at least annually.

  • Warfarin: maintain TTR ≥70%.

  • Cardiac imaging for LAA thrombus after breakthrough event.

  • Evaluate APS/other thrombophilias when appropriate.

  • Optimize AF and vascular risk factors.


Key Take-Home Points

  • Both warfarin and DOACs leave a residual 1–2%/yr risk of stroke/systemic embolism.

  • Breakthrough events require a structured evaluation: exposure, interactions, renal function, imaging, targeted labs.

  • Do not routinely add antiplatelet therapy to OAC in AF without another indication.

  • Switching agents or considering LAAO may be appropriate in selected patients.


References

  • Granger CB, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011 (ARISTOTLE trial).

  • Paciaroni M, et al. Int J Stroke. 2021.

  • StatPearls: Splenic Infarcts. Updated 2024.

  • StatPearls: Renal Infarction. Updated 2025.

  • 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for AF. Circulation. 2023.

  • Gorczyca I, et al. JACC. 2021.

  • Ren JF, et al. World J Cardiol. 2018; Sci Rep. 2022.

  • Pengo V, et al. APS & anticoagulation guidance. ASH/ISTH/EULAR.

 
 
bottom of page